Informed consent: challenges and perspectives of patients and healthcare providers in Georgia
pdf

Keywords

informed consent,
patient autonomy,
healthcare professionals,
patient comprehension,
doctor-patient communication,
Georgia.

How to Cite

GONGLADZE, N. and PITSKHELAURI, N. (2026) “Informed consent: challenges and perspectives of patients and healthcare providers in Georgia”, One Health & Risk Management , 7(2), pp. 50-62. doi: 10.38045/ohrm.2026.2.04.

Abstract

Background. The informed consent process is crucial in ensuring patient autonomy and ethical medical practice. The study aimed to assess understanding, experiences, and perceptions of informed consent among hospital personnel and the general population in Georgia, and to identify key challenges in its implementation. 

Material and methods. Two structured questionnaires were developed, one targeting healthcare professionals and the other the general population. The surveys explored respondents' knowledge, experiences, and opinions on informed consent. Data were analyzed to identify key topics and areas for improvement in the process.

Results. Among the general population, 68.8% reported receiving the informed consent form before medical services, while only 50.2% were informed of their right to accept or decline it. Nearly half (48.3%) reported misunderstandings of information provided by doctors. For hospital personnel, while there was unanimous agreement on the necessity of obtaining informed consent before procedures, only 59.3% demonstrated full understanding of required consent content, and only 10.2% correctly identified who else can sign the consent form. Notably, only 6.8% comprehended the nuances of verbal consent.

Conclusions. Significant gaps persist in the informed consent process in Georgia, including communication barriers, time constraints, and inconsistent understanding among patients and providers. Enhanced training, clear communication strategies, standardized practices, and the integration of technology are recommended to improve the informed consent process.

https://doi.org/10.38045/ohrm.2026.2.04
pdf

|Views: 492| |pdf Downloads: 166|


pdf
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Nino Gongladze, Nato Pitskhelauri

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Starting from July 1, 2025, the article processing fee will be 20 EUR (or the equivalent in MDL at the official exchange rate of the National Bank of Moldova). The publication fee for an accepted article will be 150 EUR (or the equivalent in MDL).

Details here:

Processing Fee
A processing fee of 20 EUR (or the equivalent in MDL) will be charged for articles accepted for scientific review by the editorial committee of the One Health and Risk Management journal.
Note: This fee will only be charged if your article has been technically reviewed and accepted.

Publication Fee
Starting from 01.07.2025, a fee of 150 EUR (or the equivalent in MDL) will be charged for articles accepted for publication.
Additionally, authors will bear the cost of English language editing/translation services if the manuscript requires intervention. The fee is 5 EUR (or the equivalent in MDL) per page edited/translated.
The total cost for English editing/translation services will be communicated by the Editorial Board after the manuscript is accepted for publication.

Payment Details:
Payments should be made in MDL to the bank account opened in the name of the Biosafety and Biosecurity Association of the Republic of Moldova.
The invoice will be issued by the end of the month in which the payment was made.

Organization: Biosafety and Biosecurity Association of the Republic of Moldova
Address: 5C A. Cozmescu Street
Fiscal Code: 1017620004120
Bank Code (SWIFT): AGRNMD2X451
IBAN: MD34AG000000022513622370